Failed defence in Toronto’s van attack trial damaged the autism community, activists say


Lawyers argued killer was incapable of knowing actions were morally wrong. When Michael Cnudde, who has autism, learned that lawyers for the man accused of Toronto’s deadly van attack in 2018 would be using the disorder as a defence for their client, his immediate reaction was: “How dare they?” Yet despite the rejection of that argument on Wednesday by Ontario Superior Court Justice Anne Molloy, who found Alek Minassian guilty on all 10 counts of first-degree murder, there is still concern that the trial itself further stigmatized the autistic community. “There’s a lot of damage that’s been done already,” said Cnudde, who dismissed the defence’s arguments as “junk science.”

Notifications - Subscriptions
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x